Chapter 5 & 6

Chapter 5 was totally different than what her style of writing has been through the rest of the book. It was even worse than the humor she tries to integrate into her writing. Then in chapter 6 she brings it back. I don't get the point she is trying to make with this. Stick with one style, don't just throw this other one in the middle of it.

I hate the way she tries to relate things, like in the beginning of chapter 5 where she is giving the reader a history lesson...what does this have to do with global warming? I wish she would just get to the point instead of beating around the bush.

I also thought she was trying to say that humans are to blame for global warming, then she goes into how it would happen regardless of what humans did...so what is the big deal? Yes it is happening faster but if it was going to happen eventually, why the worry?

I am still not sure what she is trying to do with this book. I haven't liked it from the beginning and I don't think anything she writes will change my mind other wise. Her style may work for some people but it just gets annoying, perhaps that is why she threw in chapter 5 to show she knows how to write about serious subjects, but it wasn't very successful in my eyes.